The acceptance of each paper should be decided by three reviewer's agreements for publication.
Editor receives manuscript submission, and then sends it to three reviewers.
If one of the three reviewers disagrees with publication, editor will select the fourth reviewer for peer review.
If the fourth reviewer agrees with publication, editor can inform the author.
If the fourth reviewer disagrees with publication, editor will select the fifth reviewer.
If the fifth reviewer agrees with publication, editor can inform the author. If not, the paper is treated as rejected.
If there is no review expert of an article in expert database, the external experts will be invited for peer review.
The final decision of acceptance lies with the chief editor based on the comments of the reviewers. Authors are informed of the decision (Acceptance, minor revision, major revision or rejection).
Each peer review process is expected to be completed within 10 days (the first three reviewers should finish reviewing within 10 days, the rest two reviewers have 10 days each).
The journal has international leading experts from different country.
Two statistical editorial members are responsible for the review of statistics.
Two linguistic editorial members are in review of languages in each article.
Crosscheck plagiarism screening tool is used to prevent plagiarism.
